Перевод
Язык оригинала
16.07.2025
The future of the world cannot be expressed in binary code, it is in the diversity of its voices
Introduction
Under conditions of the interconnected world, digital technologies have changed the forms of consumption, production, and exchange of information. However, this progress causes profound cultural issues, especially for such coun- tries as Mexico and Russia, identity of which is facing pressure fr om algorithms of foreign platforms. This essay discusses how social media recommendation systems dominated by American and Chinese companies homogenize content, promote dissemination of disinformation, and create information bubbles, thus restricting true cultural exchange. The essay also analyses language related and geopolitical barriers hindering mutual understanding between the two countries, and offers solutions based on bilateral cooperation of our countries and digital sovereignty.
Technology and culture: algorithms as digital barriers
Such digital platforms as Meta (Facebook, Instagram) and Google operate based on algorithmic models meant to maximize the time users spend online that
prioritize viral and polarizing content. According to results of a research by Oxford University (2023), 67 % of users in Latin America and 58 % in Russia consume news mostly via social networks wh ere algorithms prioritize simplified and sensa- tional content. This results in two main challenges:
Cultural bubbles:
Algorithms create echo chambers that reinforce stereotypes. For example, in Mexico, content about Russia ohen comes down to historical (Cold War) or polit- ical (the Kremlin) stereotypes. At the same time, its literary richness or traditions of indigenous peoples of Siberia are ignored. In Russia, algorithms prefer negative news about Mexico associated with drug trafficking while its cultural heritage, such as traditional cuisine or monumental painting, is hushed up.
Strategic disinformation:
Such platforms as TikTok and X (Twitter) were used to disseminate false nar- ratives. During the operation in Ukraine, Reuters Institute (2022) recorded bots promoting conspiracy theories in Mexico, which affected Mexicans’ perception of Russian society. Simultaneously, manipulative content about Mexican migration was distributed on the Russian platform VKontakte without contextual verification.
ASYMMETRIC ACCESS TO INFORMATION
Cultural exchange between Mexico and Russia faces the following structural barriers:
Language and distance:
Only 0.1 % of Mexicans speak Russian (the National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico, 2020), and the Spanish language is neither that popular in Russia. This circumstance forces us to rely on automated translations (Google Translate), in which cultural nuances are ohen being lost. Geographical remote- ness reduces the opportunities for educational and tourist exchange.
Limitations of the Media:
According to Statista portal (2023), 90 % of streaming content in Mexico is ensured by American companies (Netflix, Disney+). In Russia, such platforms as Start and Okko promote local cinematography, but their coverage is minimal on the global scale. This is how the imbalance is established, in which Hollywood defines the “world culture” by sidelining indigenous peoples.
TOWARDS DIGITAL CULTURAL SOVEREIGNTY
Three main areas of activity are suggested to solve the challenges mentioned above:
Algorithm regulation:
Such countries as Germany, where the Law on Social Networks applies (2017), require transparency of algorithmic criteria. Mexico and Russia may take similar
measures and demand that platforms prioritize proven and culturally diverse con- tent.
Local and joint platforms:
Russia is promoting VKontakte and Yandex, while Mexico could encour- age such projects as sovereign social network creation or support joining to Ibe- ro-American platforms. Bilateral initiative of the countries, e. g. streaming portal with translated movies and books, would promote direct dialogue.
Training in informational security:
Educational programs that teach how to spot algorithmic bias and find reliable sources. The National Autonomous University of Mexico and the Moscow State University could develop joint courses on media literacy.
CONCLUSION
Rethinking of the cultural future
In 1943, Mexican muralists and Soviet filmmakers began to use art as a com- mon language in the fight against fascism. Today, in the face of algorithms that divide us, Mexico and Russia have an opportunity to lead new cultural internation- alism, in which technologies do not make us similar to each other, but enhance our unique features.
Technologies are biased: they reflect and strengthen the global dynamics of power. To protect cultural diversity of Mexico and Russia, it is necessary to ques- tion monopolies of foreign platforms, invest in national digital infrastructure, and strengthen bilateral liaisons. This is the only way to build a fair information ecosys- tem, in which algorithms serve culture and not the other way round.
There are two alternative paths: either to submit to digital bubbles or to build bridges, where poetry of Alexander Pushkin engages in a dialogue with bright brushstrokes of Frida Kahlo without any intermediaries in form of algorithms. On a canvas, where the passion of her Mexican roots intertwines with the romantic impulses of the Russian poet.
Under conditions of the interconnected world, digital technologies have changed the forms of consumption, production, and exchange of information. However, this progress causes profound cultural issues, especially for such coun- tries as Mexico and Russia, identity of which is facing pressure fr om algorithms of foreign platforms. This essay discusses how social media recommendation systems dominated by American and Chinese companies homogenize content, promote dissemination of disinformation, and create information bubbles, thus restricting true cultural exchange. The essay also analyses language related and geopolitical barriers hindering mutual understanding between the two countries, and offers solutions based on bilateral cooperation of our countries and digital sovereignty.
Technology and culture: algorithms as digital barriers
Such digital platforms as Meta (Facebook, Instagram) and Google operate based on algorithmic models meant to maximize the time users spend online that
prioritize viral and polarizing content. According to results of a research by Oxford University (2023), 67 % of users in Latin America and 58 % in Russia consume news mostly via social networks wh ere algorithms prioritize simplified and sensa- tional content. This results in two main challenges:
Cultural bubbles:
Algorithms create echo chambers that reinforce stereotypes. For example, in Mexico, content about Russia ohen comes down to historical (Cold War) or polit- ical (the Kremlin) stereotypes. At the same time, its literary richness or traditions of indigenous peoples of Siberia are ignored. In Russia, algorithms prefer negative news about Mexico associated with drug trafficking while its cultural heritage, such as traditional cuisine or monumental painting, is hushed up.
Strategic disinformation:
Such platforms as TikTok and X (Twitter) were used to disseminate false nar- ratives. During the operation in Ukraine, Reuters Institute (2022) recorded bots promoting conspiracy theories in Mexico, which affected Mexicans’ perception of Russian society. Simultaneously, manipulative content about Mexican migration was distributed on the Russian platform VKontakte without contextual verification.
ASYMMETRIC ACCESS TO INFORMATION
Cultural exchange between Mexico and Russia faces the following structural barriers:
Language and distance:
Only 0.1 % of Mexicans speak Russian (the National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico, 2020), and the Spanish language is neither that popular in Russia. This circumstance forces us to rely on automated translations (Google Translate), in which cultural nuances are ohen being lost. Geographical remote- ness reduces the opportunities for educational and tourist exchange.
Limitations of the Media:
According to Statista portal (2023), 90 % of streaming content in Mexico is ensured by American companies (Netflix, Disney+). In Russia, such platforms as Start and Okko promote local cinematography, but their coverage is minimal on the global scale. This is how the imbalance is established, in which Hollywood defines the “world culture” by sidelining indigenous peoples.
TOWARDS DIGITAL CULTURAL SOVEREIGNTY
Three main areas of activity are suggested to solve the challenges mentioned above:
Algorithm regulation:
Such countries as Germany, where the Law on Social Networks applies (2017), require transparency of algorithmic criteria. Mexico and Russia may take similar
measures and demand that platforms prioritize proven and culturally diverse con- tent.
Local and joint platforms:
Russia is promoting VKontakte and Yandex, while Mexico could encour- age such projects as sovereign social network creation or support joining to Ibe- ro-American platforms. Bilateral initiative of the countries, e. g. streaming portal with translated movies and books, would promote direct dialogue.
Training in informational security:
Educational programs that teach how to spot algorithmic bias and find reliable sources. The National Autonomous University of Mexico and the Moscow State University could develop joint courses on media literacy.
CONCLUSION
Rethinking of the cultural future
In 1943, Mexican muralists and Soviet filmmakers began to use art as a com- mon language in the fight against fascism. Today, in the face of algorithms that divide us, Mexico and Russia have an opportunity to lead new cultural internation- alism, in which technologies do not make us similar to each other, but enhance our unique features.
Technologies are biased: they reflect and strengthen the global dynamics of power. To protect cultural diversity of Mexico and Russia, it is necessary to ques- tion monopolies of foreign platforms, invest in national digital infrastructure, and strengthen bilateral liaisons. This is the only way to build a fair information ecosys- tem, in which algorithms serve culture and not the other way round.
There are two alternative paths: either to submit to digital bubbles or to build bridges, where poetry of Alexander Pushkin engages in a dialogue with bright brushstrokes of Frida Kahlo without any intermediaries in form of algorithms. On a canvas, where the passion of her Mexican roots intertwines with the romantic impulses of the Russian poet.
Introducción
En un mundo interconectado, las tecnologías digitales han redefinido la forma en que las sociedades consumen, producen y comparten información. Sin embargo, este avance conlleva desafíos culturales profundos, especialmente para países como México y Rusia, cuyas identidades enfrentan presiones derivadas de algoritmos de plataformas extranjeras. Este ensayo explora cómo los sistemas de recomendación de redes sociales, dominados por empresas estadounidenses o chinas, homogenizan contenidos, fomentan desinformación y crean "burbujas informativas", limitando el intercambio cultural genuino. Además, se analizan las barreras lingüísticas y geopolíticas que dificultan el conocimiento mutuo entre ambas naciones, proponiendo soluciones basadas en la cooperación binacional y la soberanía digital.
Tecnología y Cultura: Algoritmos como Barreras Digitales
Las plataformas digitales como Meta (Facebook, Instagram) y Google operan bajo modelos algorítmicos diseñados para maximizar el tiempo de usuario, priorizando contenidos virales o polarizantes. Según un estudio de la Universidad de Oxford (2023), el 67% de los usuarios en América Latina y el 58% en Rusia consumen noticias principalmente a través de redes sociales, donde algoritmos favorecen narrativas simplificadas o sensacionalistas. Esto genera dos problemas clave:
Burbujas Culturales:
Los algoritmos crean cámaras de eco que refuerzan estereotipos. Por ejemplo, en México, contenidos sobre Rusia suelen reducirse a clichés históricos (la Guerra Fría) o políticos (el Kremlin), ignorando su riqueza literaria o tradiciones indígenas siberianas. En Rusia, los algoritmos priorizan noticias negativas sobre México vinculadas a narcotráfico, oscureciendo su patrimonio cultural, como la cocina tradicional o el arte muralista.
Desinformación Estratégica:
Plataformas como TikTok y X (Twitter) han sido instrumentalizadas para difundir narrativas falsas. Durante la operación a Ucrania, Reuters Institute (2022) documentó cómo bots promovieron teorías conspirativas en México, afectando la percepción pública rusa. A la inversa, contenido manipulado sobre migración mexicana circuló en VKontakte, plataforma rusa, sin verificación contextual.
Asimetrías en el Acceso a la Información
El flujo cultural entre México y Rusia enfrenta barreras estructurales:
Idioma y Distancia:
Solo el 0.1% de los mexicanos habla ruso (INEGI, 2020), y viceversa, el español es marginal en Rusia. Esto obliga a depender de traducciones automatizadas (Google Translate), que suelen perder matices culturales. La distancia geográfica reduce oportunidades de intercambios académicos o turísticos.
Medios de Comunicación Limitados:
Según Statista (2023), el 90% de los contenidos streaming en México son producidos por empresas estadounidenses (Netflix, Disney+). En Rusia, plataformas como Start o Okko promueven cine local, pero su alcance global es mínimo. Esto perpetúa un desequilibrio donde Hollywood define la "cultura global", marginando expresiones autóctonas.
Hacia una Soberanía Digital Cultural
Para contrarrestar estos desafíos, se proponen tres ejes de acción:
Regulación de Algoritmos:
Países como Alemania, con la Ley de Redes Sociales (2017), exigen transparencia en criterios algorítmicos. México y Rusia podrían adoptar marcos similares, obligando a plataformas a priorizar contenidos verificados y culturalmente diversos.
Plataformas Locales y Colaborativas:
Rusia ha impulsado VKontakte y Yandex, mientras México podría fortalecer proyectos como la creación de redes sociales soberanas o promover alianzas con plataformas iberoamericanas. Una iniciativa binacional, como un portal streaming con cine y literatura traducida, fomentaría el diálogo directo.
Educación Digital Crítica:
Programas educativos que enseñen a identificar sesgos algorítmicos y fuentes confiables. La UNAM y la Universidad Estatal de Moscú podrían desarrollar cursos conjuntos sobre alfabetización mediática.
Conclusión
Re imaginar el Futuro Cultural
En 1943, los muralistas mexicanos y el cine soviético encontraron en el arte un lenguaje común contra el fascismo. Hoy, frente a algoritmos que nos dividen, México y Rusia tienen la oportunidad de liderar un nuevo internacionalismo cultural: uno donde la tecnología no nos haga idénticos, sino que amplifique lo que nos hace únicos.
La tecnología no es neutral: refleja y amplifica dinámicas de poder global. Para México y Rusia, proteger la diversidad cultural requiere desafiar el monopolio de plataformas extranjeras, invertir en infraestructura digital propia y fomentar lazos bilaterales. Solo así se construirá un ecosistema informativo equitativo, donde algoritmos sirvan a la cultura, no al revés.
La alternativa es clara: O nos sometemos a burbujas digitales, o construimos puentes donde la poesía de Aleksandr Pushki dialogue con los trazos vibrantes de Frida Kahlo, sin intermediarios algorítmicos. En un lienzo donde la pasión de sus raíces mexicanas se entrelaza con el ímpetu romántico del poeta ruso.
Читать весь текст
Социальные сети Instagram и Facebook запрещены в РФ. Решением суда от 21.03.2022 компания Meta признана экстремистской организацией на территории Российской Федерации.