Human Development with Integrity, Technology and Traditional values

In our current World (actually, since ever existed), it has been, is and will be Multipolar.

In the past, the Western media and “proclaiming” to Anglo-Saxonism-Trans- actional-Zionist-“pseudo-Humanist”, certainly with a dark agenda, in the last ca. 200 years and more precisely since the Post-World War II. 200 years and more pre­cisely since the Post-WWII and after the Post “перестройка и гласность” , to the current US-NATO provoked Conflict in Ukraine, the Balkans, and other regions of the World, have falsely promoted that there is only one All Powerful Pole mastering wills, lives and destinies, aka “USA & UK” and disdaining everything that does not represent their Anglo-Saxonism, from language, their “culture”, their “race”, and interests. E.g. Commonwealth creating Wars like the Opium War, infiltrating over 89 free government-countries destabilizing for Anglo-Saxon self-interests.

The individual and collective historical subconscious of us Hispanics and Lati­nos carries sometimes with forgetfulness, sometimes with contempt of our reality and our identity and culture and technological, creative, commercial, educational capacity that in the late Middle Ages the English and Saxons began systematically to attack and destroy all identity of Hispanic-Latinidad, in the Americas, in Asia, in Africa, in Europe.

Attacking language, culture, freedom, the mixing of our races, and the destruc­tion of autonomies.

The pro-Anglo interventions of the “libertarian” Garibaldi in South America to the perverse Ambassador (read “spy”) Joel Roberts Poinsett destabilizing gov­ernments and countries, creating conflicts in Mexico preparing the theft of terri­tories from Mexico (as Monrists and precursors of Wolfowitz) and the despicable Ambassador W. Wilson.

Attacking Hispanic-Latin and Orthodox Christianity, as it does today in Ukraine and Central Asia, proposing “libertinism” (read “disordered, anarchistic, subjugated mind, to mediate without consequences”) towards agendas similar to the late Middle Ages, and causally aligned to Zionism.

(see how the US decided to destroy with atomic bombs, “coincidentally” the two Japanese cities that had the highest concentration of Japanese Catholic Chris­tians).

Taking by force: like Panama, and 55% of Mexican Territory, cheating the Russian Empire with Alaska and the Crimean War by England: both Anglo-Saxon interests and without honoring trade agreements to weaken Imperial Russia (and American Spain and Imperial Mexico), destroying the Hispanic Philippines among others, creating ideological chaos in Brazil and Gran Colombia, exterminating the Natives and despising the Hispanic/Latin-Native American mix, of Anglo- Saxon European exploitation (incl. German-Teutonic) in Africa, and thus enrich­ing “Western” Europe, similar to WWII that Hitler despised all things Slavic and secretly making pacts with Zionists allowing Zionists to enrich “Western” Europe, allowing the terrible massacres that followed.

(it should be said that the real Holocaust, was not Jewish, but the Holocaust is of Slavs, between 20 million to 27 million Christian Slavs, and other almost 20 million in Christian Europe, it is evident

the historical and foolish bias to call Holocaust to the lamentable massacre of 6 million Jews, mainly poor, abandoned and given to Hitler by the rich Jews them­selves Zionists).

Few will recall that the US theft of Mexican territory was orchestrated by the then US Democratic Party and the York Freemasons in secret collusion with the Scottish Freemasons of Mexico and England, coincidentally, Zionist interests.

The Republicans would later say “they would never again attack a weak nation”. 200 years later they are still doing so or creating destabilization for their interests.

We could fill petabytes of history and cases.

On the other hand, today, we can create collectively and with purpose-aimed leadership:

'Technology accessible to the population, and generate sustainability and sus­tainability viably with Energies from the traditional petrochemicals to the hack­neyed green, hydrogen (green, blue, pink, others) and mini-nuclear. Development of technology with civil applications in agriculture, production of healthy food, regeneration and conservation of rivers, waters, fields and natural environments, for present and future generations.

The development of Software, Middleware and Hardware for vehicles (mobil­ity), residential-commercial-hospital, terrestrial infrastructure, naval, railway, air, commercial, industrial, research-development-innovation, medical, air-space, electric-energy.

Hardware should be understood as not only linked to SW and MW, but also to tangibles such as steel structures, aluminum, graphene, and tangible industry in general.

Is it true that part of SpaceX carries Russian technology, or is actually all of SpaceX based on Russian technology but now “Americanized” (from the USA)?

If so, at least the initial base of electronics and AI in SpaceX, shows the Rus­sian nobility of sharing technology as it did with China during the Post Revolution with Никита Сергеевич Хрущёв bringing technology and resources to China... or the cultural scientific talent in created in Cuba.

Hydrogen that can yield to speed up agricultural production of healthy food and energy production, combining Green, Blue, Grey, Pink, Yellow variants in tradi­tional and innovative chains, e.g. CO2 recovery in industry and chains, or exhausted heat in Nuclear and/or Refineries, Methane-Agricultural-Food-Hospitality etc.

Leaving oil for tertiary and quaternary processes for future generations, maxi­mizing reserves and economy, without reaching the academic extreme that West­ern Europe is experiencing with the abuse of the “green” ideology.

Then, Technology is directly linked to the environment and the human being.

Being responsible, and congruent, these two elements must be monitored and controlled with ethics and reference of Government and Citizenship, avoiding e.g. unwanted biological manipulations in human beings and/or genetics, or technol­ogies manipulative of society or restrictive of the human being, his creative mind, but always respectful of the positive traditional values, and not the degenerative ones as the Soros-USA (Democrat)-DeepState-British agenda.

Educating and cultivating the human mind and the spirit and essence of being with traditional values and in technological progress, the Global Human Integrity is cemented, quasi-holistic: moral conduct, ethical spirit, cultivated and educated mind, society of propositive traditional values, and not degenerative.

Taking these 3 elements mentioned to the citizens, to the society, it must be understood as “Investments in human capital”, yes but beyond “Investment” it is a right and an obligation, in both senses of the one who regulates-proposes-pro- motes-finances it and of the one who receives it-powers and shares it, formerly giving it the dimension of “investment” could limitingly consider it in a utilitarian equation rather than a tool in service of humanity and the human being per se. It is a noble act of humanity.

More than “Human Capital” is “The Human BEING per se”, without enter­ing into a semantic-dialectic game: “The Development of the Human Being” with “Global Integrity” using “Technology” responsibly and with values with sustainable legacy “of the Environment”.

Technology at the service and disposal of the Human Being, with Traditional Values Integrally responsible for its Environment (our Earth) assuring the fullness of potential: Poet, Legislator, Scientist, Technician, Engineer, Artistic Creator, Family.

Create companies with the Western ESG ESR concept whose real focus is to maximize margins for investors (speculation) and/or owners and/or management bonuses with higher operational productivity?

Or,

To create responsible companies whose social impact via sustainable and bal­anced production permeates to a greater number of people and community but at the cost of redistributed margins and with the result of diminished “productivity”?

Without going into the dialectic of Capital in its variants, read then, create companies for society or create companies for monetary profitability?

The first maximizes particular interests, consumerism and creating “dissatis- fiers” to produce “satisfiers” (vanitas vanitatum et Omnia vanitas est), the second ensures a social balance of opportunities, even in the difference of individual capa­bilities.

The first continues to create a greater gap with a heartbreaking impact on human beings and their collective and community... or is it an incentive to form more entrepreneurship?

How to do it?

What ensures better social stability and individual and collective growth?

Is technology replacing the human being by maximizing margins and produc­tivity or is it the reading of freeing the mind and potential of the human being to other activities?

Should it be regulated, controlled, legislated?

Thereof, the thesis to invest and create Technology and focus on The Devel­opment of Human Being with Global Integrity.

It is true that the differentiation of human potentials and their capacities would be a tabula rasa assuming the same capacities and potentialities, being in reality that it would lead to the frustration of some individuals or collectivities, if not even to the same degenerative involution.

Consequently, the technical-scientific-artistic-social educational system, should potentiate both: capacities of the human being, and the collective commu­nities with traditional values towards a sustainable progress with integrity.

How would the State and Society give certainty for the collectivity to the human being and the community?

Is the capital-industrial thesis of “without growth” (increasing profits) compa­nies die” valid?

This thesis is based on exploitation and maximization in short term, be it con­sumerist, speculative or other variants, but not on sustainability.

Aligning business growth to world population growth and life expectancy and from the equation creating productive models?

This in no way aligned to the perverse US-Soros-DeepState-Gates-Clinton DEI plan, but to the true human being with traditional approach.

How then under the multipolarity of the World and the multiculturality of Humanity?

BRICSX is a model of Multicultural and Multipolar Association, even in the diverse differences of these members with the Leadership and intelligence of Rus­sia.

How to potentiate BRICSX to an order of multipolar respect with technology, values and opportunities to the human being and the social community?

Organic evolution with values and sustainability based on technology, order, discipline, respect, and humanity, even in the differences find the beauty of the communion of the essence between humans and the State with integrating and regulating Leadership.

organic or planned evolution?

Either proposal appeals more to the intellect and more questions with oppor­tunities.

In the human collective, the individual talent, the community and society, is enriched from the mind, its connection with the community, common and social good, with traditional values and respect for the difference of our cultures and integration, creating technology and basic science for the community and nations, nurturing the human intellect, empowering their capabilities, and generating equal opportunities, in community respect, e.g. those with different abilities and condi­tions.